Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2024 58 • VG SZ III 2024 58 KI-generiert

Environmental Regulation Compliance vs. Operational Burden

Geschäftsnummer III 2024 58
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged a governmental decree mandating the use of trailing hose technology for slurry application, arguing that this requirement unfairly burdened their farming operations due to topography and size, which they claimed made compliance impractical and economically damaging. The court upheld the decree, reasoning that the regulation serves the essential public interest of environmental protection, specifically preventing nutrient runoff into water bodies, and that the imposed measure is a proportionate means of achieving this goal, despite the specific operational difficulties asserted by the petitioner, as the general environmental benefit outweighs the individual burden.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Environmental Regulation Compliance vs. Operational Burden: The court upheld the decree, reasoning that the regulation serves the essential public interest of environmental protection, specifically preventing nutrient runoff into water bodies, and that the imposed measure is a proportionate means of achieving this goal, despite the specific operational difficulties asserted by the petitioner, as the general environmental benefit outweighs the individual burden.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gewässerschutz Umweltnorm Schutz des öffentlichen Interesses Bewirtschaftung der Ressourcen Kontrolle der Umweltbelastungen Durchführungsverordnungen Umweltschutzrecht (Landwirtschaft: Schleppschlauchpflicht) | Umweltschutzrecht
KI-generiert
III 2024 95
Appeal Against Refusal of Exception to Mandatory Drag Hose Slurry Application
III 2023 204
Refueling Station Drainage Modernization Upheld Despite Retroactivity Claims
STK 2021 9
Unpermitted Construction and Environmental Violations Appeal
III 2024 31
Landfill Permit Extension Upheld Despite Environmental and Traffic Safety Challenges
III 2024 3
Challenge to Building Permit Zoning Compliance

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 58 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Umweltschutzrecht (Landwirtschaft: Schleppschlauchpflicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: