Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2024 196 • VG SZ III 2024 196 KI-generiert

Land Use Zoning Appeal Dismissal

Geschäftsnummer III 2024 196
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An applicant appealed a decision regarding land use planning, specifically challenging the inclusion of certain plots in a development zone, arguing that the designated use contradicted prior zoning designations and that necessary environmental and infrastructure considerations were neglected, but the court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies had properly weighed the relevant public interests and adhered to established planning procedures, thus finding no legal error in the classification of the land for the intended development.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Land Use Zoning Appeal Dismissal: An applicant appealed a decision regarding land use planning, specifically challenging the inclusion of certain plots in a development zone, arguing that the designated use contradicted prior zoning designations and that necessary environmental and infrastructure considerations were neglected, but the court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies had properly weighed the relevant public interests and adhered to established planning procedures, thus finding no legal error in the classification of the land for the intended development.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einzonung Erschliessung administrative Entlassung Interessenabwägung Zonenplanänderung Plangenehmigung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision governs the imposition of court costs upon the losing party.
KI-generiert
III 2023 5
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning Approval of Commercial Development
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2019 217
Spatial Planning Dispute Appeal Dismissed
III 2022 45
Land Use Permit Appeal Standing Challenge

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision governs the imposition of court costs upon the losing party.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 196 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wangen, Seestrasse 2, Postfach 264, 8855 Wangen SZ, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n