Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2024 139 • VG SZ III 2024 139 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Geschäftsnummer III 2024 139
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a decision that upheld a building permit granted to another party for the construction of a residence on a plot of land, arguing that the decision disregarded necessary planning law considerations regarding the plot's suitability for development. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prior authorities had correctly assessed the factual circumstances and appropriately applied the relevant planning law, specifically finding that the decision-making bodies had adequately considered and weighed the planning law requirements concerning the plot's development potential and integration into the surrounding area, thereby not violating the appellant's rights.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prior authorities had correctly assessed the factual circumstances and appropriately applied the relevant planning law, specifically finding that the decision-making bodies had adequately considered and weighed the planning law requirements concerning the plot's development potential and integration into the surrounding area, thereby not violating the appellant's rights.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligungspflicht Baugelände Bodenrecht Aufenthaltsbewilligungen Ausnahmebewilligung bei der Baubewilligung Bauträger Korporationsrecht (Gründung einer Flurgenossenschaft) | Korporationsrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court fees.
KI-generiert
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court fees.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 139 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat C.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. E.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw F.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n