Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2024 138 • VG SZ III 2024 138 KI-generiert

Estate Community v. Municipal Council on Building Permit for Out-of-Zone Construction

Geschäftsnummer III 2024 138
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An estate community challenged the decision of the municipal council, which was upheld by the higher administrative bodies, to approve a building permit for the construction of a commercial/residential building on a property situated outside the designated development zone, arguing that the project was not permissible under existing regulations for isolated buildings. The court determined that the construction project, which involved a new building to replace an older, smaller structure on the same site, did not meet the criteria for an isolated building because it fundamentally altered the building's nature and size, thus necessitating adherence to the zoning regulations that prohibited construction outside designated areas, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Estate Community v. Municipal Council on Building Permit for Out-of-Zone Construction: The court determined that the construction project, which involved a new building to replace an older, smaller structure on the same site, did not meet the criteria for an isolated building because it fundamentally altered the building's nature and size, thus necessitating adherence to the zoning regulations that prohibited construction outside designated areas, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
kommunale Baubewilligung Bauzone Bauträger Bau- und Zonenordnung Grenzbaurecht Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appeal is dismissed and costs are imposed on the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 138 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Januar 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Fiona Schuler, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Erbengemeinschaft A.________, bestehend aus: \n 1. B.________, \n 2. C.________, \n 3. D.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Morschach, Schulstrasse 6, 6443 Morschach, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n