Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 9 • VG SZ III 2023 9 KI-generiert

Welfare Recipient vs. Welfare Authority: Substantiation of Expenses

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 9
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant challenged a decision by the welfare authority, subsequently upheld by the cantonal government, to reduce their economic assistance based on insufficient justification of expenses. The court determined that while the appellant had a right to assistance, the authority acted within its discretion in demanding sufficient substantiation for the claimed expenditures, and since the appellant failed to provide adequate documentation to demonstrate the necessity of the costs for securing subsistence, the decision to reduce the aid was legally sound.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Welfare Recipient vs. Welfare Authority: Substantiation of Expenses: The court determined that while the appellant had a right to assistance, the authority acted within its discretion in demanding sufficient substantiation for the claimed expenditures, and since the appellant failed to provide adequate documentation to demonstrate the necessity of the costs for securing subsistence, the decision to reduce the aid was legally sound.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sozialhilfe wirtschaftliche Rechte sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit Verfahren um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege Demonstrationsrecht Veruntreuung von Geldern Sozialhilfe (Kürzung der wirtschaftlichen Hilfe) | Sozialhilfe
KI-generiert
III 2024 39
Appeal Regarding Social Welfare Benefits Determination
III 2017 2
Care Recipients' Appeal on Social Assistance and Legal Fees Upheld in Part
III 2023 58
Appeal Regarding Judicial Review of Welfare Debt Enforcement and Procedural Costs
III 2016 35
Social Assistance Repayment Calculation Review and Partial Appeal Success
III 2023 113
Social Welfare Repayment Obligation Upheld on Misreported Housing Compensation

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. April 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Fürsorgebehörde B.________, \n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Sozialhilfe (Kürzung der wirtschaftlichen Hilfe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: