Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 73 • VG SZ III 2023 73 KI-generiert

Municipality Land Use Plan Revision Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 73
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against the partial revision of the land use plan for the "Bahnhof Süd, Goldau" area by the municipality, which was upheld by the cantonal government. The court reasoned that the appellant's constitutional claim regarding the principle of equal treatment was unfounded because the planning adjustments, which addressed specific infrastructural needs in the designated area, constituted a situation objectively distinguishable from the circumstances of the properties cited by the appellant for comparison, thereby justifying different regulatory treatments.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Municipality Land Use Plan Revision Appeal: The court reasoned that the appellant's constitutional claim regarding the principle of equal treatment was unfounded because the planning adjustments, which addressed specific infrastructural needs in the designated area, constituted a situation objectively distinguishable from the circumstances of the properties cited by the appellant for comparison, thereby justifying different regulatory treatments.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision des Raumplans Sondernutzungsplan Umzonung Gemeindeland Bebauungsplan Verfassungsänderung
KI-generiert
III 2024 110
Property Owners' Appeal Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Amendment
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2024 65
Municipality v. Cantonal Government: Land Use Plan Revision and Water Protection Zone Demarcation Appeal
III 2018 181
Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 73 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ \n vertreten durch B.________, c/o C.________, \n2. B.________, c/o C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n|\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Teilrevision Nutzungsplanung Gemeinde Arth: Bahnhof Süd, Goldau) |\n \n\n

\n