Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 52 • VG SZ III 2023 52 KI-generiert

Challenge to Expert Opinion Cost Assessment in Planning Law

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 52
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A litigant challenged the assessment of costs associated with an expert opinion required by a municipal council in a planning and building law matter, where the litigant had initiated the procedure. The court found that the procedural law allowed the administrative authority to charge the costs of an expert opinion to the applicant, even if the opinion was deemed necessary for the decision, and since the assessment of these costs was conducted appropriately according to the relevant regulations, the appeal against the cost decision was dismissed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Challenge to Expert Opinion Cost Assessment in Planning Law: The court found that the procedural law allowed the administrative authority to charge the costs of an expert opinion to the applicant, even if the opinion was deemed necessary for the decision, and since the assessment of these costs was conducted appropriately according to the relevant regulations, the appeal against the cost decision was dismissed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sachverständigenkosten Planungskosten Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Bauordnung Honorarfestsetzung Rechtsgutachten Planungs- und Baurecht (Kosten eines Gutachtens) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.
KI-generiert
III 2019 28
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Expert Opinion Consideration
ZK2 2017 72
Appeal Regarding Assessment of Professional Fees and Costs in Prior Application Ruling
III 2022 113
Neighboring Property Owners' Right to Access Expert Opinion in Building Permit Dispute
ZK2 2017 5
Appeal of Cost Assessment Upheld
III 2020 203
Challenge to Planning Decision Admissibility

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 52 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Morschach, Schulstrasse 6, 6443 Morschach, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Kosten eines Gutachtens) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: