Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 200 • VG SZ III 2023 200 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Continuation of Pre-Trial Detention for Foreign National

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 200
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The matter concerns a challenge to a decision from the Forced Measures Court and the Migration Office regarding a foreign national's status. The core issue involved whether the continuation of a pre-trial detention measure was legally justified based on the factual circumstances presented. The court reasoned that the relevant criteria for maintaining the detention measure were still met, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and dismissing the appeal, concluding that the grounds for the detention remained valid under the applicable procedural law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Against Continuation of Pre-Trial Detention for Foreign National: The core issue involved whether the continuation of a pre-trial detention measure was legally justified based on the factual circumstances presented. The court reasoned that the relevant criteria for maintaining the detention measure were still met, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and dismissing the appeal, concluding that the grounds for the detention remained valid under the applicable procedural law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Haftverlängerung Fremdes Recht Freizügigkeitseinschränkung stichhaltige Gründe Wegweisung im Asylverfahren Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Ausländerrecht (Ausschaffungshaft) | Ausländerrecht
KI-generiert
BEK 2020 97
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order Upheld
BEK 2021 37
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Upheld
BEK 2018 172
Appeal Regarding Continuation of Pre-Trial Detention
BEK 2025 125
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2019 171
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 200 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration, Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Zwangsmassnahmengericht, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2267, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n