Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2023 20 • VG SZ III 2023 20 KI-generiert

Petitioner's Appealability of Partial Administrative Decision Regarding Building Permit

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged administrative decisions concerning a building permit application that had been partially approved by a lower administrative body and then further restricted by a subsequent authority regarding the scope of development, specifically challenging the dismissal of their appeal regarding the extent of building rights. The court reasoned that the initial decision, which allowed some construction, was not appealable by the petitioner because the subsequent administrative review, which introduced further limitations, constituted a new decision that aggregated the prior partial approval and the new restrictions, meaning the petitioner's proper recourse was against this latter comprehensive decision, not the initial partial grant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Petitioner's Appealability of Partial Administrative Decision Regarding Building Permit: The court reasoned that the initial decision, which allowed some construction, was not appealable by the petitioner because the subsequent administrative review, which introduced further limitations, constituted a new decision that aggregated the prior partial approval and the new restrictions, meaning the petitioner's proper recourse was against this latter comprehensive decision, not the initial partial grant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligungserteilung Gesuch an eine Behörde Teilbewilligung Teilentscheid administrative Entlassung Kognitionsbefugnis Planungs- und Baurecht (Rückbaumassnahmen) | Planungs- und Baurecht
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. November 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, 2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n