Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 153 • VG SZ III 2023 153 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 153
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against municipal, district, and cantonal authorities concerning planning or development regulations. The specific details of the dispute and the factual background are not fully described in the provided excerpt, but the matter pertains to a dispute between private parties (appellants) and four public administrative bodies regarding a decision made by the local municipal council. The court's reasoning for its verdict on February 22, 2024, is not present in this extract, as it only lists the composition of the bench and the parties involved.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision: The specific details of the dispute and the factual background are not fully described in the provided excerpt, but the matter pertains to a dispute between private parties (appellants) and four public administrative bodies regarding a decision made by the local municipal council. The court's reasoning for its verdict on February 22, 2024, is not present in this extract, as it only lists the composition of the bench and the parties involved.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gemeindebehörden Streitgegenstand Bebauungsplan Ausnahmebewilligung bei der Baubewilligung Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Lokalwahl
KI-generiert
III 2019 109
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2020 34
Municipality Planning Appeal Dismissed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 153 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n vertreten durch B.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, Rathausplatz 6, Postfach 263, 6415 Arth, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Bezirksrat Schwyz, Rathaus, Postfach 60, 6430 Schwyz, \n4. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n