Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 124 • VG SZ III 2023 124 KI-generiert

Council Construction Decision Affirmation

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 124
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a challenge to a decision by the local council regarding a construction matter, with appeals against the decision being subsequently rejected by higher cantonal authorities. The reviewing court dismissed the appeal because the appellants failed to demonstrate that the challenged decision violated any specific legal provisions or that the procedural steps taken by the lower authorities were fundamentally flawed or arbitrary, thus upholding the previous rulings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 106 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Council Construction Decision Affirmation: The reviewing court dismissed the appeal because the appellants failed to demonstrate that the challenged decision violated any specific legal provisions or that the procedural steps taken by the lower authorities were fundamentally flawed or arbitrary, thus upholding the previous rulings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligungserteilung kommunale Gebietskörperschaft Verfahrensüberprüfung Baupolitik Revers Gestaltungsentscheid

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 106 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed on the merits based on this provision.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs are awarded against the appellants because their appeal was unsuccessful.
KI-generiert
III 2020 189
Council Decision Challenge Affirmed
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 106 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed on the merits based on this provision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are awarded against the appellants because their appeal was unsuccessful.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 124 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. E.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n