Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2023 107 • VG SZ III 2023 107 KI-generiert

Appeal of Protective Care Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2023 107
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) concerning an individual under protective care. The appellant challenged the KESB's ruling, necessitating a review of the authority's actions and the underlying circumstances requiring protective measures. The court ultimately upheld the KESB's decision, reasoning that the existing protective order remained necessary based on the facts presented, thereby affirming the prior determination regarding the individual's care and supervision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Protective Care Decision: The appellant challenged the KESB's ruling, necessitating a review of the authority's actions and the underlying circumstances requiring protective measures. The court ultimately upheld the KESB's decision, reasoning that the existing protective order remained necessary based on the facts presented, thereby affirming the prior determination regarding the individual's care and supervision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Kindeswohlgefährdung Sorgfaltspflicht begleitetes Besuchsrecht Verletzung von Schutznormen begründeter Entscheid
KI-generiert
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 60
Appeal Against KESB Decision on Financial Measures in Child and Adult Protection
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2022 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Protective Measures Decision
III 2021 95
Appeal of Protective Services Decision

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 107 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n c/o Altersund Pflegeheim B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) \n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n