Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2022 87 • VG SZ III 2022 87 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 87
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority to change the mandated representative for an individual. The reviewing court upheld the decision, reasoning that the Authority was empowered to change the mandated representative when new information or circumstances suggested the prior representative was no longer suitable or that a different appointment better served the represented person's interests, and the initial representative had not demonstrated an error in the Authority's assessment of suitability or the need for a change.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority: The reviewing court upheld the decision, reasoning that the Authority was empowered to change the mandated representative when new information or circumstances suggested the prior representative was no longer suitable or that a different appointment better served the represented person's interests, and the initial representative had not demonstrated an error in the Authority's assessment of suitability or the need for a change.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Bestellung eines Vertreters Kindeswohlgefährdung Änderung einer Genehmigung Praxisänderung Gesuch an eine Behörde

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Applied to rule on the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 87 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juli 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Mandatsträgerwechsel/ weitere Begehren) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: