Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 86 • VG SZ III 2022 86 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 86
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Vorinstanz / Staat
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a lower authority's decision regarding a protective assistance arrangement (Vertretungsbeistandschaft) for an adult. The appellant challenged the establishment of this arrangement, which involved appointing an assistant to manage the affairs of the protected person. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the establishment of the protective assistance was legally justified based on the demonstrated necessity to protect the interests of the adult, thereby affirming the lower authority's finding regarding the need for external support in managing their affairs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult: The appellant challenged the establishment of this arrangement, which involved appointing an assistant to manage the affairs of the protected person. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the establishment of the protective assistance was legally justified based on the demonstrated necessity to protect the interests of the adult, thereby affirming the lower authority's finding regarding the need for external support in managing their affairs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
rechtlich geschütztes Interesse Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Anstellungsbehörde Verfahren um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege Beistandspflicht Assistenzbeitrag

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
KI-generiert
III 2018 209
Appeal Regarding Adult Protective Measure and Alternative Care Arrangement
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment
III 2020 80
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Placement Decision
III 2021 150
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Welfare Measures
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juli 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, c/o ________, Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Innerschwyz, Postfach 1240, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n \n1. C.________ und D.________, \n Beigeladene, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Vertretungsbeistandschaft nach