Annuity Valuation and Partial Waiver Appeal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA party challenged a decision regarding the calculation of an annuity claim, asserting that the prior court erred by not recognizing a partial waiver of future claims when determining the capital value. The appellate court found that the prior court correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions and established jurisprudence concerning the valuation of annuities, concluding that the purported waiver did not constitute a legally recognized ground for adjusting the capital value calculation under the applicable law, thereby affirming the original judgment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAnnuity Valuation and Partial Waiver Appeal: The appellate court found that the prior court correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions and established jurisprudence concerning the valuation of annuities, concluding that the purported waiver did not constitute a legally recognized ground for adjusting the capital value calculation under the applicable law, thereby affirming the original judgment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 81 III 2022 82 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. September 2022 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2022 81), |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n\n
\n