Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 75 • VG SZ III 2022 75 KI-generiert

Teacher Selection Transparency and Equal Treatment

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 75
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged the rejection of their application for a teaching position in a public school, arguing that the selection process, which included an evaluation by a third party that was not publicly disclosed, violated their right to equal treatment under the law. The court reasoned that while a public body has discretion in teacher selection, this discretion is limited by the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination, and transparency, thus requiring that all evaluation criteria and the results thereof be made accessible to the applicant to allow for meaningful legal recourse against potentially arbitrary decisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Teacher Selection Transparency and Equal Treatment: The court reasoned that while a public body has discretion in teacher selection, this discretion is limited by the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination, and transparency, thus requiring that all evaluation criteria and the results thereof be made accessible to the applicant to allow for meaningful legal recourse against potentially arbitrary decisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gleichbehandlung und Transparenz Auswahlkriterien Zugang zum Beruf Berufsverbot Arbeitsplatzbewertung Wahl eines Staatsbediensteten Kosten Sonderschulung (Internatsaufenthalt) | Verschiedenes

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article was cited for the decision regarding court costs.
KI-generiert
III 2022 27
Education Department Contract Award Dispute
III 2022 12
Appeal Against Public Contract Award Exclusion Due to Insufficient Key Personnel Experience
III 2018 116
Appeal Against Appointment of Child Representative
BEK 2022 125
Administrative Office v. Individual Regarding Civil Service Refusal
III 2022 4
Public Procurement Appeal Suspension Revocation for Modular School Facility Lease

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article was cited for the decision regarding court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Volksschulen und Sport, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2191, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. B.________ \n |\n

\n\n

\n