Waste Collection Procurement Termination Upheld
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA company appealed a decision by lower administrative bodies to terminate a public procurement procedure concerning the collection of residual and green waste, arguing the termination was unlawful. The court reasoned that public procurement law grants the awarding authority broad discretion in the award process, including the right to abandon the procedure if circumstances that formed the basis for the invitation to tender have significantly changed or if the tender is no longer expedient, and since the termination decision, made before the award, was not obviously arbitrary or contrary to law, it was to be upheld.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Waste Collection Procurement Termination Upheld: The court reasoned that public procurement law grants the awarding authority broad discretion in the award process, including the right to abandon the procedure if circumstances that formed the basis for the invitation to tender have significantly changed or if the tender is no longer expedient, and since the termination decision, made before the award, was not obviously arbitrary or contrary to law, it was to be upheld.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertUsed to declare the appeal inadmissible because it concerned the refusal of the request for reconsideration regarding the decision on costs.
Imposed the costs of the federal proceedings on the appellant.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 47 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirk Einsiedeln, handelnd durch den Bezirksrat, \n Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Gemeinde Unteriberg, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, Waagtalstrasse 27, 8842 Unteriberg, \n3. Gemeinde Oberiberg, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, \n Jessenenstrasse 20, 8843 Oberiberg, \n4. Gemeinde Alpthal, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, Dorfstrasse 19, 8849 Alpthal, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n
\n|\n Gegenstand |\n Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht (Vergabe Kehrichtund Grüngutsammlung; Abbruch des Verfahrens) |\n
\n\n
\n \n