Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 46 • VG SZ III 2022 46 KI-generiert

Corporate Road Access Dispute Against District and Cantonal Authorities

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 46
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a dispute over road management, specifically the removal of a driveway or road access, initiated by two corporate entities challenging decisions made by a District Council and a Cantonal Government. The court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided excerpt, would address the legality and procedural correctness of the administrative decisions regarding the removal of the specified road access, based on relevant road and administrative law pertaining to the authority of the lower administrative bodies.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Corporate Road Access Dispute Against District and Cantonal Authorities: The court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided excerpt, would address the legality and procedural correctness of the administrative decisions regarding the removal of the specified road access, based on relevant road and administrative law pertaining to the authority of the lower administrative bodies.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zufahrtsstrasse Verwaltungsbehörde Strassenverkehrsrecht Kompetenzkonfliktbeilegung Gemeindestrasse E-Government Verschiedenes (Strassenwesen; Wegrodel, Wegabrufung) | Verschiedenes

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to govern the allocation of court costs for the appeal.
KI-generiert
III 2025 113
Challenge to Road Usage Plan Designation
III 2018 126
Road Contribution Classification and Infrastructure Scope Appeal
III 2023 125
Municipality v. Cantonal Government Regarding Building Permit Reinstatement for Local Road Extension
III 2010 115
Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions
III 2019 231
Spatial Planning Dispute: Municipal and Cantonal Decisions Challenged

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to govern the allocation of court costs for the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 46 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ AG \n2. B.________ GmbH \n Beschwerdeführerinnen, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. C.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Verschiedenes (Strassenwesen; Wegrodel, Wegabrufung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: