Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 20 • VG SZ III 2022 20 KI-generiert

Challenge to Epidemic-Based Business Closure Order

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged an administrative order for a temporary business closure issued on epidemiological grounds by a regional department of the interior. The court reasoned that the administrative decision imposing the closure was based on a competent authority acting within its legal mandate to protect public health during an epidemic, finding the measure proportionate and necessary given the assessed risk to the population.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Challenge to Epidemic-Based Business Closure Order: The court reasoned that the administrative decision imposing the closure was based on a competent authority acting within its legal mandate to protect public health during an epidemic, finding the measure proportionate and necessary given the assessed risk to the population.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Betriebsschliessung Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen gesundheitliche Risiken Gesundheitswesen polizeilicher Grund Zulässige Gründe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings because her appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
III 2023 33
Restaurant Closure Upheld Over COVID Certificate Enforcement Failure
III 2021 170
Restaurant Closure Order Mootness Appeal
III 2021 203
Appeal Against Expired COVID-19 Business Closure Order Declared Moot
II 2020 68
Loss of Earnings Compensation Denial for Business Closure
III 2021 73
Post Office Closure Challenge Upheld on Public Interest Grounds

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings because her appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Juni 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Departement des Innern, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2160, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Gesundheitsrecht (Anordnung einer temporären Betriebsschliessung aus epidemiologischen Gründen) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: