Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 183 • VG SZ III 2022 183 KI-generiert

Traffic License Revocation Proportionality Review

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 183
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision by a traffic authority to revoke their driving privileges due to a driving offense, arguing that the penalty was excessively harsh and disproportionate given their specific circumstances, including potential professional hardship. The court reasoned that while the offense warranted a penalty under traffic law, the authority had not sufficiently considered the mitigating factors presented by the appellant when determining the severity of the license withdrawal, thus necessitating a review and potential adjustment of the administrative penalty to ensure proportionality.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Traffic License Revocation Proportionality Review: The court reasoned that while the offense warranted a penalty under traffic law, the authority had not sufficiently considered the mitigating factors presented by the appellant when determining the severity of the license withdrawal, thus necessitating a review and potential adjustment of the administrative penalty to ensure proportionality.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Führerausweisentzug verwaltungsrechtlicher Widerruf Strafzumessungsgrad Strafmilderungsgründe Verhältnismässigkeit mildernder Umstand Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
KI-generiert
III 2021 204
Traffic Authority License Revocation Appeal
III 2019 188
Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Based on Traffic Offenses
III 2018 176
Driver License Revocation Appeal Based on Culpability Assessment
III 2018 90
Traffic License Revocation Due to Repeated Violations
III 2020 33
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 183 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: