Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 173 • VG SZ III 2022 173 KI-generiert

KESB Mandate Holder Replacement Appeal Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 173
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) concerning the change of the mandate holder for adult protection, where the KESB replaced the existing mandate holder with a new one. The court found that the KESB's decision to replace the mandate holder was based on a significant deterioration of the working relationship between the authority and the former holder, which amounted to a just cause for the change, and therefore, the appeal was dismissed as the KESB had acted within its discretion and for the best interest of the protected person.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

KESB Mandate Holder Replacement Appeal Dismissed: The court found that the KESB's decision to replace the mandate holder was based on a significant deterioration of the working relationship between the authority and the former holder, which amounted to a just cause for the change, and therefore, the appeal was dismissed as the KESB had acted within its discretion and for the best interest of the protected person.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Kindeswohlgefährdung Praxisänderung Stellenwechsel Änderung einer Genehmigung wichtiger Grund
KI-generiert
III 2017 221
Appeal Against Replacement of Mandated Representative by KESB
III 2019 136
Appeal Against Termination of Representative Guardianship
III 2019 194
KESB Residence Revocation Appeal on Child Custody and Guardianship
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2022 87
Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 173 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic. iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Wechsel der Mandats-trägerin) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: