Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 162 • VG SZ III 2022 162 KI-generiert

Municipal Council Extension of Gravel Pit Obligations Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 162
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A group of individuals appealed a decision by the municipal council that granted a third extension for fulfilling obligations related to the dismantling and infilling of gravel pits, challenging the legality of this extension. The court reasoned that the municipality had the authority to grant extensions under planning and building law, and since the appellants failed to demonstrate that the council abused its discretion or that the extension was otherwise unlawful, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the council's decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Municipal Council Extension of Gravel Pit Obligations Appeal: The court reasoned that the municipality had the authority to grant extensions under planning and building law, and since the appellants failed to demonstrate that the council abused its discretion or that the extension was otherwise unlawful, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the council's decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gemeindeaufgabe Bauzeitverlängerung Lokalwahl Planungsermessen Untätigkeitsklage Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant must bear the judicial costs of the appeal proceedings.
KI-generiert
III 2023 3
Residents v. Municipal Council (Gravel Pit Reclamation)
III 2018 233
Appeal Concerning Gravel Pit Restoration Deadlines and Objection Cost Allocation
III 2018 154
Municipal Gravel Extraction Denial Upheld Based on Existing Use Rights
III 2021 135
Municipal Land Use Appeal Dismissed
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant must bear the judicial costs of the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 162 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. März 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Gemeinderat Tuggen, R.________strasse 14, Postfach 159, \n 8856 Tuggen, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Abbau und Auffüllung von Kiesgruben: dritte Fristverlängerung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: