Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 121 • VG SZ III 2022 121 KI-generiert

Plaintiffs v. Defendant: Appeal Regarding Restitution for Unperformed Contractual Services

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 121
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal by plaintiffs against a lower court's decision that dismissed their claim seeking the recovery of payments made under a contract, where the defendant had not performed their agreed-upon services. The court reasoned that the plaintiffs, despite having initiated performance under the contract, failed to timely and properly set a deadline for the defendant's performance, and subsequently failed to establish a legally effective notice of default, thus precluding their claim for restitution based on non-performance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Plaintiffs v. Defendant: Appeal Regarding Restitution for Unperformed Contractual Services: The court reasoned that the plaintiffs, despite having initiated performance under the contract, failed to timely and properly set a deadline for the defendant's performance, and subsequently failed to establish a legally effective notice of default, thus precluding their claim for restitution based on non-performance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
vertraglicher Schadenersatz Rückerstattung und Schadenersatz Feststellungsklage Zahlungsfrist Nichtschuld Vertragsverletzungsklage
KI-generiert
ZK1 2022 44
Contractual Liability Appeal Dismissal
ZK1 2021 7
Claim for Payment Appeal Dismissed
ZK1 2024 18
Appeal of Monetary Judgment Based on Contract Dispute
I 2020 90
Contractual Dispute Over Service Payment and Quality
ZK1 2011 10
Appeal Regarding Contractual Defects

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 121 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. E.________ \n2. F.________ \n3. G.________ \n4. H.________ GmbH \n Kläger, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw R.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n I.________, \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. J.________, |\n \n\n

\n