Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 115 • VG SZ III 2022 115 KI-generiert

Guardianship Termination Appeal under Protective Law

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 115
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a lower court's decision regarding child and adult protective law, specifically concerning the termination of a legal guardianship (Beistandschaft). The court's reasoning, delivered in a decision dated August 29, 2022, focused on whether the prerequisites for ending the guardianship were met, presumably finding either that the conditions necessitating the guardianship no longer existed or that the termination was otherwise appropriate under the relevant protective law statutes.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Guardianship Termination Appeal under Protective Law: The court's reasoning, delivered in a decision dated August 29, 2022, focused on whether the prerequisites for ending the guardianship were met, presumably finding either that the conditions necessitating the guardianship no longer existed or that the termination was otherwise appropriate under the relevant protective law statutes.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vormundschaft Erwachsenenschutzverfahren Einstellung von Leistungen Sistierung des Besuchsrechts Rechtsgutachten Kindeswohl
KI-generiert
III 2020 50
Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2019 136
Appeal Against Termination of Representative Guardianship

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 115 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Aufhebung einer Beistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: