Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2022 104 • VG SZ III 2022 104 KI-generiert

Administrative Permit Rejection Appeal Inadmissibility

Geschäftsnummer III 2022 104
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged administrative decisions concerning the rejection of a permit application for constructing an apartment building, which was subsequently upheld by various cantonal authorities. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the rejection decision directly and currently affected their rights, as the application process had not progressed to a stage where a specific legal entitlement to the permit could be asserted against the public interest considerations cited by the authorities, rendering the appeal premature and lacking the necessary standing.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Administrative Permit Rejection Appeal Inadmissibility: The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the rejection decision directly and currently affected their rights, as the application process had not progressed to a stage where a specific legal entitlement to the permit could be asserted against the public interest considerations cited by the authorities, rendering the appeal premature and lacking the necessary standing.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Gesuch an eine Behörde Beschwerdelegitimation öffentliches Gebäude Bewilligungsentzug Wohnbewilligung Umweltschutzrecht (Schadstoffmessung) | Umweltschutzrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
KI-generiert
III 2017 161
Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2018 54
Appeal of Building Permit Denial Regarding Procedural Compliance
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2023 20
Petitioner's Appealability of Partial Administrative Decision Regarding Building Permit

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 104 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. November 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ GmbH, \n2. B.________ GmbH, \n3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Amt für Umwelt und Energie, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2162, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n