Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2021 196 • VG SZ III 2021 196 KI-generiert

Claimant Denied Victim Compensation for Insufficient Injury Threshold

Geschäftsnummer III 2021 196
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant sought victim compensation (Genugtuung) under victim support legislation, which was denied by the initial authority. The authority's denial was based on the finding that the claimant's alleged injuries did not meet the threshold for requiring official intervention or assistance, as the incident did not constitute a serious violation of personal rights under the relevant statute. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the statute's prerequisite for compensation—a significant impairment of personal integrity due to criminal conduct—was not met by the facts presented, thus justifying the refusal of the requested compensation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant Denied Victim Compensation for Insufficient Injury Threshold: The authority's denial was based on the finding that the claimant's alleged injuries did not meet the threshold for requiring official intervention or assistance, as the incident did not constitute a serious violation of personal rights under the relevant statute. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the statute's prerequisite for compensation—a significant impairment of personal integrity due to criminal conduct—was not met by the facts presented, thus justifying the refusal of the requested compensation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Integritätsentschädigung Opferrechte strafbares Verhalten Erreichen des Schwellenwerts Unfallopfer Schadenersatzanspruch Opferhilfe (Genugtuung) | Opferhilfe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 196 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Gesundheit und Soziales, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2161, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Opferhilfe (Genugtuung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: