Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2021 161 • VG SZ III 2021 161 KI-generiert

Corporation v. Administrative Body: Planning Law and Heritage Protection of Dwelling

Geschäftsnummer III 2021 161
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An administrative appeal was filed by a corporation challenging a decision related to planning and building law concerning the protection status of a specific house, following proceedings involving multiple administrative bodies. The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the provided excerpt, addresses the grant or denial of a building permit in the context of cultural heritage protection for the property in question, requiring an assessment of the relevant planning regulations and the historical significance of the dwelling against the administrative body's prior determinations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Corporation v. Administrative Body: Planning Law and Heritage Protection of Dwelling: The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the provided excerpt, addresses the grant or denial of a building permit in the context of cultural heritage protection for the property in question, requiring an assessment of the relevant planning regulations and the historical significance of the dwelling against the administrative body's prior determinations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bauordnung Immobilienbesitz Kulturgüter Dienstrechtliche Stellungen konnexe Verfahren Plangenehmigung
KI-generiert
III 2024 189
Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests
III 2024 120
Heritage Associations v. Municipal Council on Building Permit
III 2021 39
Appeal Regarding Zoning and Building Law Decision
III 2024 162
Appeal on Planning and Building Law Regarding Development Plan
III 2025 100
Corporation's Appeal on Spatial Planning Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 161 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. März 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung; Schutzwürdigkeit \n Haus D.___weg, Küssnacht) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: