Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2021 159 • VG SZ III 2021 159 KI-generiert

Spousal Residency Retention Post-Divorce Integration Requirements

Geschäftsnummer III 2021 159
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision by a cantonal executive body, which itself upheld a migration authority's refusal to grant residency, concerning the requirements for maintaining residency status based on marriage. The court reasoned that for the spouse of a citizen to retain residency rights after divorce, the marriage must have lasted for at least three years prior to the separation, and the applicant must demonstrate sufficient integration into the country, which was not sufficiently established in this case as the applicant had not actively pursued language courses or sought employment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Spousal Residency Retention Post-Divorce Integration Requirements: The court reasoned that for the spouse of a citizen to retain residency rights after divorce, the marriage must have lasted for at least three years prior to the separation, and the applicant must demonstrate sufficient integration into the country, which was not sufficiently established in this case as the applicant had not actively pursued language courses or sought employment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ehegatte Eingliederung in den Arbeitsprozess Retentionsrecht Residenzpflicht internationale Scheidung vorsorgliche Massnahmen bei Scheidung
KI-generiert
III 2018 76
Residence Status Appeal After Divorce
III 2022 109
Residency Status Revocation Upheld Due to Insufficient Integration
III 2020 45
Residence Permit Revocation After Short Marriage Separation
III 2020 10
Residence Permit Revocation Upheld Despite Post-Marital Hardship Claim
III 2022 188
Residence Permit Revocation Following Separation Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 159 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration, Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n