Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2021 133 • VG SZ III 2021 133 KI-generiert

Property Owners v. District Council Regarding Sewage Maintenance Contract Termination

Geschäftsnummer III 2021 133
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A group of property owners appealed a decision concerning the maintenance of a sewage line, specifically the termination of a maintenance contract by the district council, which was upheld by the cantonal governmental council. The court reasoned that the termination of the maintenance contract was lawful because the original contract was based on a specific statutory provision that had been superseded by new legislation granting the municipality the exclusive right to operate and maintain public sewage facilities, thus rendering the prior private maintenance agreement invalid and justifying its unilateral termination by the responsible public authority.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Property Owners v. District Council Regarding Sewage Maintenance Contract Termination: The court reasoned that the termination of the maintenance contract was lawful because the original contract was based on a specific statutory provision that had been superseded by new legislation granting the municipality the exclusive right to operate and maintain public sewage facilities, thus rendering the prior private maintenance agreement invalid and justifying its unilateral termination by the responsible public authority.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Wartungsvertrag Privateigentum Aufhebungsvereinbarung gesetzlicher Anspruch Abwasseranschlussgebühren Zustand der Mietsache
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 133 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n9. I.________, \n10. J.________, \n11. K.________, \n12. L.________, \n13. M.________, \n14. N.________, \n15. O.________, \n16. P.________, A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. Q.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Umweltschutzrecht (Unterhalt Schmutzwasserleitung: Kündigung Unterhaltsvertrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: