Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2020 84 • VG SZ III 2020 84 KI-generiert

Social Welfare Authority v. Father (Child Custody Modification)

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 84
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A social welfare authority appealed a decision concerning the custody and maintenance obligations for a minor, whose primary care had been transferred to the father following the parents' separation, based on the child's wish to live with the father and the assessment that this arrangement served the child's best interests, even though the mother had initially been granted custody. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to transfer custody to the father was factually sound and legally correct, as it appropriately considered the child's stated preference and the comprehensive evaluation supporting the conclusion that the existing placement maximized the child's welfare and development, thereby meeting the threshold for modification under relevant family law principles.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Social Welfare Authority v. Father (Child Custody Modification): The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to transfer custody to the father was factually sound and legally correct, as it appropriately considered the child's stated preference and the comprehensive evaluation supporting the conclusion that the existing placement maximized the child's welfare and development, thereby meeting the threshold for modification under relevant family law principles.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Abänderung von Kindesunterhalt Kindeswohl Obhutsübertragung familienrechtliche Pflichten elterliche Gewalt begründeter Entscheid Sozialhilfe (Berücksichtigung von Wohnkosten / Mietzinsanteil) | Sozialhilfe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision determines the costs assessed against the losing party in the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 84 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. August 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Fürsorgebehörde A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n verbeiständet durch C.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n