Social Welfare Authority v. Father (Child Custody Modification)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA social welfare authority appealed a decision concerning the custody and maintenance obligations for a minor, whose primary care had been transferred to the father following the parents' separation, based on the child's wish to live with the father and the assessment that this arrangement served the child's best interests, even though the mother had initially been granted custody. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to transfer custody to the father was factually sound and legally correct, as it appropriately considered the child's stated preference and the comprehensive evaluation supporting the conclusion that the existing placement maximized the child's welfare and development, thereby meeting the threshold for modification under relevant family law principles.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Social Welfare Authority v. Father (Child Custody Modification): The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to transfer custody to the father was factually sound and legally correct, as it appropriately considered the child's stated preference and the comprehensive evaluation supporting the conclusion that the existing placement maximized the child's welfare and development, thereby meeting the threshold for modification under relevant family law principles.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe provision determines the costs assessed against the losing party in the appeal.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 84 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. August 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Fürsorgebehörde A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n verbeiständet durch C.________, \n |\n
\n\n
\n