Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2020 65 • VG SZ III 2020 65 KI-generiert

Guardianship Accounting Breach and Appointment of Administrator

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned an appeal regarding child and adult protection law, specifically the management of a child's assets after the death of one parent, where the surviving parent, who was the legal guardian, failed to provide timely and complete accounting as required. The court reasoned that the surviving parent's failure to fulfill the obligation to render a complete and timely account of the child's assets, despite prior requests, constituted a serious breach of their fiduciary duty, justifying the lower court's decision to order an accounting by an appointed administrator to ensure the child's financial interests were protected.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Guardianship Accounting Breach and Appointment of Administrator: The court reasoned that the surviving parent's failure to fulfill the obligation to render a complete and timely account of the child's assets, despite prior requests, constituted a serious breach of their fiduciary duty, justifying the lower court's decision to order an accounting by an appointed administrator to ensure the child's financial interests were protected.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Beistandsbestellung Pflichtverletzung Finanzierungsrechnung Kindeswohlgefährdung Erwachsenenschutz Fiduziar

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

It regulates the costs associated with the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 65 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n C.________ und D.________, A.________, Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Anzehrung des Kindes­vermögens nach