Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 6 • VG SZ III 2020 6 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 6
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against a decision from a child and adult protection authority concerning the care and custody of a minor. The appellant challenged the prior ruling, which likely involved restrictions or changes to parental rights or responsibilities regarding the child. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned based on the established legal standards and the specific facts of the case concerning the child's best interests, ultimately upholding or modifying the authority's decision based on the evidence presented regarding the child's welfare and the suitability of the involved parties.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision: The appellant challenged the prior ruling, which likely involved restrictions or changes to parental rights or responsibilities regarding the child. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned based on the established legal standards and the specific facts of the case concerning the child's best interests, ultimately upholding or modifying the authority's decision based on the evidence presented regarding the child's welfare and the suitability of the involved parties.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kindeswohl Erwachsenenschutzbehörde elterliche Gewalt Kindesschutz erworbener Anspruch Rechtsgutachten
KI-generiert
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2019 142
Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld
III 2021 82
Mother's Appeal Against Child Protection Custody Order Dismissed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 6 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) C.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n