Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 59 • VG SZ III 2020 59 KI-generiert

Petitioners v. Cantonal Migration Office and Government (2020)

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 59
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved two petitioners, one of whom was a Portuguese national, challenging decisions made by the Cantonal Migration Office and the Cantonal Government regarding their status, with the specific nature of the challenged decision not fully detailed but implying an administrative action concerning residence or status within the jurisdiction, and the court ultimately reached its decision on June 8, 2020, based on its review of the administrative proceedings and applicable law, as is typical in appeals against cantonal administrative migration rulings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Petitioners v. Cantonal Migration Office and Government (2020): The case involved two petitioners, one of whom was a Portuguese national, challenging decisions made by the Cantonal Migration Office and the Cantonal Government regarding their status, with the specific nature of the challenged decision not fully detailed but implying an administrative action concerning residence or status within the jurisdiction, and the court ultimately reached its decision on June 8, 2020, based on its review of the administrative proceedings and applicable law, as is typical in appeals against cantonal administrative migration rulings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
aufenthaltsrechtlicher Status Staatssekretariat für Migration Statusklage Asylrevision E-Government Freizügigkeitsgarantie Ausländerrecht (Familiennachzug) | Ausländerrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the federal appeal.
KI-generiert
III 2017 131
Cantonal Council and Welfare Authority Review
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2019 92
Cantonal Asylum Review and Deportation Affirmation
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2022 171
Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision on Municipal and Cantonal Administrative Actions

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the federal appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, Staatsangehöriger von Portugal, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13 \n Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n