Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 55 • VG SZ III 2020 55 KI-generiert

Appeal of Child Protection Care Arrangement Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 55
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party contested a decision by a child and adult protection authority regarding the care arrangements for a child, appealing the ruling to a higher court. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the prior ruling was based on a comprehensive assessment of the child's best interests, encompassing necessary protective measures and suitable living conditions, thereby finding no grounds to overturn the authority's expert evaluation and legal application regarding the custody arrangement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Child Protection Care Arrangement Decision: The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the prior ruling was based on a comprehensive assessment of the child's best interests, encompassing necessary protective measures and suitable living conditions, thereby finding no grounds to overturn the authority's expert evaluation and legal application regarding the custody arrangement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kindeswohl Kindesschutz Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Lebensbedingungen Kindesschutzkosten Betreuungsvertrag
KI-generiert
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2019 142
Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 80
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Placement Decision

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. C.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n