Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2020 52 • VG SZ III 2020 52 KI-generiert

Protective Authority Action Exceeded Jurisdiction Over Legal Representative

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 52
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A legal representative challenged a decision made by a child and adult protective authority concerning their professional involvement, arguing that the authority's decision exceeded its jurisdiction. The court, upon review, determined that the authority's action constituted an administrative measure exceeding its statutory mandate, as the relevant legal framework did not grant it the power to issue such a directive to a legal representative regarding their professional conduct in this specific context, thus leading to the annulment of the challenged decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Protective Authority Action Exceeded Jurisdiction Over Legal Representative: The court, upon review, determined that the authority's action constituted an administrative measure exceeding its statutory mandate, as the relevant legal framework did not grant it the power to issue such a directive to a legal representative regarding their professional conduct in this specific context, thus leading to the annulment of the challenged decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verwaltungsbehörde Verordnungsbefugnis Nichtigkeitsklage im Gemeinschaftsrecht Haftung des Beistands Entscheidungsbefugnis Richtlinie
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 52 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 6. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Dr.med. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n