Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 34 • VG SZ III 2020 34 KI-generiert

Municipality Planning Appeal Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 34
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A municipality appealed a prior administrative decision concerning a planning matter, specifically challenging the decision of a cantonal department and the subsequent ruling by the cantonal governing council. The court dismissed the municipality's appeal, reasoning that the challenged administrative decisions were not shown to violate any applicable legal provisions or established principles of administrative law, thereby upholding the lower administrative bodies' conclusions regarding the disputed planning issue.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Municipality Planning Appeal Dismissed: The court dismissed the municipality's appeal, reasoning that the challenged administrative decisions were not shown to violate any applicable legal provisions or established principles of administrative law, thereby upholding the lower administrative bodies' conclusions regarding the disputed planning issue.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Plangenehmigung Legitimation der Gemeinde kommunale Baubewilligung städtebauliches Problem Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Behördenreferendum
KI-generiert
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
III 2017 100
Appeal Dismissed Against Municipal Council Decision
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision
III 2021 135
Municipal Land Use Appeal Dismissed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 34 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Mai 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ (Gemeinde), \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Departement des Innern, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2160, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n