Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 28 • VG SZ III 2020 28 KI-generiert

Building Density and Spatial Planning Compliance in Replacement Construction Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 28
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a municipal building authority's decision, upheld by subsequent cantonal administrative bodies, which refused permission to replace an existing building with a larger one, citing that the proposed structure exceeded the established building zone's density limits and did not conform to the spatial development plan's requirements regarding the building's intended use and footprint. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed replacement building, despite being an alteration, constituted a significant expansion that violated the existing spatial planning framework which limits construction volumes and density, and that the lower building volume permitted by the zoning must be respected even in replacement construction.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Density and Spatial Planning Compliance in Replacement Construction Appeal: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed replacement building, despite being an alteration, constituted a significant expansion that violated the existing spatial planning framework which limits construction volumes and density, and that the lower building volume permitted by the zoning must be respected even in replacement construction.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zonenkonformität Bauplan Raumplanungsgesetz Gemeindebehörden Nutzungsmass baupolizeiliche Gebäudehöhe Planungs- und Baurecht (Farb- und Materialkonzept) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal appeal proceedings.
KI-generiert
III 2020 110
Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations
III 2019 87
Local Authority Zoning Compliance Appeal
III 2025 53
Appeal Against Increased Development Density Approval
III 2017 172
Zoning Permit Denial for Excessive Building Mass Upheld
III 2017 140
Appeal of Denial of Construction Permits Based on Landscape Integration and Building Volume

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 28 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. August 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirk Einsiedeln, Bauund Umweltbehörde, \n Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n