Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 212 • VG SZ III 2020 212 KI-generiert

Judicial Review of Firearm License Denial Based on Ongoing Safety Risk

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 212
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual sought judicial review of a decision by an administrative body that denied a request for a firearm license, based on a prior finding of potential danger and insufficient justification for possessing the weapon, which the administrative body maintained despite the petitioner's argument of a changed situation and professional need. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the original assessment of potential danger remained valid due to the absence of new facts demonstrating sufficient reliability and a compelling necessity outweighing the public safety risk associated with issuing the license.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Judicial Review of Firearm License Denial Based on Ongoing Safety Risk: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the original assessment of potential danger remained valid due to the absence of new facts demonstrating sufficient reliability and a compelling necessity outweighing the public safety risk associated with issuing the license.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Normenkontrolle Risikobewertung Gemeingefahr begründeter Entscheid Für Rechtsbehelfe zuständige Stellen unbefugter Waffenbesitz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible due to the nature of the decision being appealed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Determines the distribution of court costs for the unsuccessful appeal.
KI-generiert
III 2023 178
Firearm Confiscation Upheld Due to Criminal History and Psychiatric Evaluation
III 2022 58
Transportation Authority v. License Revocation Appeal
III 2018 218
Judicial Review of Precautionary Driving License Suspension
BEK 2019 9
Appeal Regarding Stay of License Decision Execution
III 2017 190
Judicial Review of Driving License Revocation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible due to the nature of the decision being appealed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Determines the distribution of court costs for the unsuccessful appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 212 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Januar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n c/o. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________, Abteilung Spezialdienste, \n Bahnhofstr. 7, Postfach 1212, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstr. 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Beigeladener, \n |\n

\n\n

\n