Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 207 • VG SZ III 2020 207 KI-generiert

Building Permit Denial Upheld Despite Equal Treatment Claim

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 207
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged a municipal council's decision, upheld by the cantonal government, which denied a building permit for a property development, arguing that the rejection violated the principle of equal treatment because similar construction projects in the vicinity had been approved. The court reasoned that the previous approvals were not comparable because the applicable legal and factual circumstances, particularly concerning compliance with spatial planning regulations and development plans applicable at the time of the respective applications, differed significantly, thus justifying the differentiated treatment and affirming the denial of the permit.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Building Permit Denial Upheld Despite Equal Treatment Claim: The court reasoned that the previous approvals were not comparable because the applicable legal and factual circumstances, particularly concerning compliance with spatial planning regulations and development plans applicable at the time of the respective applications, differed significantly, thus justifying the differentiated treatment and affirming the denial of the permit.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligungserteilung Bauträger rechtsgleiche Behandlung Planungsgrundsatz Ausnahmebewilligung bei der Baubewilligung Nichteinzonung
KI-generiert
III 2023 67
Building Permit Rejection Upheld on Planning Grounds
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2019 122
Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 207 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. März 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Oberiberg, Jessenenstrasse 20, 8843 Oberiberg, Vorinstanz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, Beigeladener, \n |\n

\n\n

\n