Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 173 • VG SZ III 2020 173 KI-generiert

Property Protection Designation Appeal Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 173
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A property owner challenged administrative decisions, first by a local municipal council and then by the cantonal government, which resulted in the designation of their property as subject to protection, impacting their planning and building rights. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the protection measure was legally sound because the public interest in preserving the object's cultural or historical significance, as determined by the relevant authorities, outweighed the individual interest of the property owner in unrestricted use or development, provided the designation complied with established legal and procedural requirements for such measures.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Property Protection Designation Appeal Dismissed: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the protection measure was legally sound because the public interest in preserving the object's cultural or historical significance, as determined by the relevant authorities, outweighed the individual interest of the property owner in unrestricted use or development, provided the designation complied with established legal and procedural requirements for such measures.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kulturgüter Eigentumsrecht Gemeindebehörden Gesetzlicher Schutz Immobilienbesitz öffentliches Gebäude Planungs- und Baurecht (Unterschutzstellung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
KI-generiert
III 2022 21
Building Protection Appeal Standing Dismissal
III 2017 126
Property Owner Standing in Building Permit Appeal
III 2016 191
Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2021 135
Municipal Land Use Appeal Dismissed
III 2017 157
Heritage Organizations v. Municipality (Standing to Appeal Demolition Permit)

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 173 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, Rathausplatz 6, Postfach 263, 6415 Arth, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Unterschutzstellung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: