Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 162 • VG SZ III 2020 162 KI-generiert

Appeal of Residency Permit Refusal Based on Insufficient Financial Means for Family Reunification

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 162
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against a decision concerning the refusal of a residency permit based on family reunification grounds, where the appellant, a foreign national, sought to join a resident family member. The court reasoned that the relevant law requires the applicant to demonstrate sufficient financial means to support themselves and the family member without recourse to public assistance, and that the appellant failed to conclusively prove the stability and adequacy of the future combined income, leading to the confirmation of the initial refusal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Residency Permit Refusal Based on Insufficient Financial Means for Family Reunification: The court reasoned that the relevant law requires the applicant to demonstrate sufficient financial means to support themselves and the family member without recourse to public assistance, and that the appellant failed to conclusively prove the stability and adequacy of the future combined income, leading to the confirmation of the initial refusal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Familiennachzugsbewilligung finanzielle Mittel hinreichendes Einkommen ausländische Wohnsitzperson Familienangehöriger ausländischer Entscheid
KI-generiert
III 2018 35
Resident Permit Holder's Family Reunification Appeal Denied Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Compelling Family Reasons
III 2019 27
Appeal Regarding Denial of Family Reunification Residence Permits
III 2017 231
Appeal Against Denial of Residence Permits Based on Insufficient Integration and Means
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2018 22
Family Reunification Denied Due to Prior Minor Offenses Overturned in Favor of Family Unity.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 162 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Advokat B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, \n Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, |\n \n\n

\n