Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 161 • VG SZ III 2020 161 KI-generiert

Agricultural Housing Need Denial Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 161
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged a decision that denied the establishment of a residential unit, arguing that the property met the legal requirements for agricultural housing need, specifically concerning the need for housing for a full-time farm laborer. The court reasoned that while the property was functionally managed as a farm, the existing farm use did not generate sufficient agricultural profit or require the employment of a full-time worker, thus failing to establish the necessary statutory need for a separate agricultural residence under the relevant federal law concerning agricultural land.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Agricultural Housing Need Denial Appeal: The court reasoned that while the property was functionally managed as a farm, the existing farm use did not generate sufficient agricultural profit or require the employment of a full-time worker, thus failing to establish the necessary statutory need for a separate agricultural residence under the relevant federal law concerning agricultural land.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
landwirtschaftliche Nutzung Bodenrecht Wohnungsbedarf Wohnnutzung Unterpacht Sondergut
KI-generiert
III 2017 181
Appeal Against Denial of Agricultural Building Conversion to Residential Unit
III 2016 134
Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld
III 2018 189
Building Permit Denial for Agricultural Land Dwelling
III 2019 29
Zoning Challenge to Agricultural Building Conversion Rejection Upheld
III 2021 60
Appeal Dismissed: Refusal to Grant Retrospective Building Permit for Unauthorized Agricultural Unit Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 161 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 31. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Landund Forstwirtschaftsrecht (Feststellungsverfügung BGBB; landwirtschaftlicher Wohnraumbedarf) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: