Residence Permit Revocation and Expulsion Order Appeal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn individual holding an EU/EFTA residence permit filed an appeal against the decision by the Cantonal Migration Authority, subsequently upheld by the Cantonal Government Council, to revoke their residence permit and issue an expulsion order, with the core issue being the legality of the revocation based on subsequent actions. The court upheld the lower authorities' decision, reasoning that the revocation of the residence permit was warranted because the appellant failed to meet the continuing legal requirements for the permit, likely due to actions or circumstances arising after the initial grant, thus justifying the subsequent expulsion order under alien law.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertResidence Permit Revocation and Expulsion Order Appeal: The court upheld the lower authorities' decision, reasoning that the revocation of the residence permit was warranted because the appellant failed to meet the continuing legal requirements for the permit, likely due to actions or circumstances arising after the initial grant, thus justifying the subsequent expulsion order under alien law.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 158 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration (AfM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ausländerrecht (Widerruf Aufenthaltsbewilligung EU/EFTA; Wegweisung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: