Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2020 125 • VG SZ III 2020 125 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Asylum and Humanitarian Residency Denial

Geschäftsnummer III 2020 125
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against the denial of an asylum application and a subsequent refusal of a residence permit based on humanitarian grounds, where the appellants, two individuals, contested the finding that the first appellant's life or freedom was not in danger in their country of origin and that no other grounds for granting asylum or humanitarian residency existed. The court reasoned that the evidence presented, including expert opinions, sufficiently supported the lower authorities' determination that the appellant's fear of persecution was not credible according to the established factual basis and that the narrow criteria for a humanitarian residence permit were not met, thus dismissing the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Asylum and Humanitarian Residency Denial: The court reasoned that the evidence presented, including expert opinions, sufficiently supported the lower authorities' determination that the appellant's fear of persecution was not credible according to the established factual basis and that the narrow criteria for a humanitarian residence permit were not met, thus dismissing the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Asylgrund Furcht vor Verfolgung Aufenthaltsbewilligung Sachverhaltsgrundlage Aberkennung der Flüchtlingseigenschaft Asylgesuch nigerianischer Staatsangehöriger

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.
KI-generiert
III 2023 188
Asylum Denial Upheld Despite Political Persecution Claim
III 2018 71
Asylum Denial Affirmation on Credibility Grounds
III 2019 13
Asylum Appeal Dismissed on Insufficient Evidence of Persecution
III 2024 178
Appeal Dismissed: Residency Permit Refusal Under Asylum Act Hardship Provision
III 2021 206
Asylum Rejection Affirmed Due to Insufficient Individualized Evidence

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 125 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, der Beschwerdeführer Ziff. 2 vertreten durch die Beschwerde­führerin Ziff. 1 und diese vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n