Company Challenge to Municipal Transport Expansion Upheld

A company challenged a municipal decision regarding the expansion of a public transport line, arguing the expansion unfairly imposed burdens on its property and violated the principle of proportionality because alternative, less burdensome routes were not sufficiently considered. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that while the expansion undeniably impacted the property, the public benefit derived from improved transport infrastructure justified the interference, and the planning authority had adequately explored and reasonably rejected alternatives based on feasibility and greater public interest considerations, thereby satisfying the proportionality requirement.