Judicial Review of Denial of Early Prison Release Based on Statutory Compliance

The petitioner, incarcerated under a mandate for serving a sentence, challenged the refusal by the judicial enforcement authority to grant early release, arguing that the authority failed to adequately consider his rehabilitative efforts and personal circumstances, including his remorse and participation in prison programs. The court reasoned that the enforcement authority's decision to deny release was justified because the statutory requirements for early release, specifically concerning the risk of reoffending and the necessary period of serving the sentence under supervision, had not yet been sufficiently met, as the overall assessment of the sentence execution indicated ongoing risk factors despite the petitioner's engagement in certain activities.