Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 92 • VG SZ III 2019 92 KI-generiert

Cantonal Asylum Review and Deportation Affirmation

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 92
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned a judicial review of a decision by a cantonal governmental body and the cantonal migration authority that denied asylum and ordered the deportation of three Ghanaian nationals. The applicants challenged the decision, arguing that their initial application was not adequately assessed under the relevant legal framework, particularly concerning the conditions in their home country that might preclude safe return. The court reasoned that the prior decision adequately addressed the known security situation and the applicants' submissions failed to present new or relevant facts that would substantially alter the assessment of the risk upon return, thus affirming the negative asylum decision and the deportation order.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Cantonal Asylum Review and Deportation Affirmation: The applicants challenged the decision, arguing that their initial application was not adequately assessed under the relevant legal framework, particularly concerning the conditions in their home country that might preclude safe return. The court reasoned that the prior decision adequately addressed the known security situation and the applicants' submissions failed to present new or relevant facts that would substantially alter the assessment of the risk upon return, thus affirming the negative asylum decision and the deportation order.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Prüfung des Asylgesuchs Migrationsrisiko Rückwanderung Normenkontrolle Rahmenbeschluss rechtmässige Wegweisung Ausländerrecht (Familiennachzug) | Ausländerrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision dictates the order regarding the payment of court costs for the unsuccessful party.
KI-generiert
III 2022 68
Cantonal Government Refusal to Rule on Hardship Residence Permit
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2023 82
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit and Expulsion Order
III 2020 125
Appeal Against Asylum and Humanitarian Residency Denial
III 2020 59
Petitioners v. Cantonal Migration Office and Government (2020)

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision dictates the order regarding the payment of court costs for the unsuccessful party.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. AA.________, \n2. BA.________, Staatsangehörige von Ghana, \n3. BB.________, Staatsangehörige von Ghana, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________ \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n