Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 9 • VG SZ III 2019 9 KI-generiert

Cantonal Government Decision on Building Permit Upheld

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 9
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The petitioners challenged a decision by the cantonal government upholding a district council's refusal to grant a building permit for an event bar structure, arguing that the structure, intended for temporary use during events, was exempt from standard building permit requirements because it only partially encroached on a protected area and was of temporary nature. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the structure's presence, even if temporary, constituted a building activity requiring a permit under spatial planning law, and the structure's impact, including partial encroachment into a protected zone, justified the refusal since the necessary legal prerequisites for an exception were not met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Cantonal Government Decision on Building Permit Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the structure's presence, even if temporary, constituted a building activity requiring a permit under spatial planning law, and the structure's impact, including partial encroachment into a protected zone, justified the refusal since the necessary legal prerequisites for an exception were not met.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligung Bauzone öffentlich-rechtliches Bauverbot Teilbewilligung Plangenehmigung begründeter Entscheid Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung: Event-Baracke) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs were imposed on the appellants according to this provision.
KI-generiert
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2019 41
Building Permit Condition Challenge Dismissed
III 2021 37
Municipality v. Cantonal Decisions on Building Permit Rejection
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2020 27
Building Permit Denial Upheld for Violation of Land Use Plan

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs were imposed on the appellants according to this provision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. I.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung: Event-Baracke) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: