Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 28 • VG SZ III 2019 28 KI-generiert

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Expert Opinion Consideration

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 28
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a governmental decision concerning the granting of a building permit, arguing that the administrative authority failed to properly consider relevant expert opinions regarding potential hazards associated with the proposed construction location. The court found that the administrative review process adequately addressed the expert assessments, concluding that the authorities were not obligated to follow the recommendation of a specific expert opinion when other relevant factors and expert reports supported the final decision, thus affirming the lower court's ruling against the appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Expert Opinion Consideration: The court found that the administrative review process adequately addressed the expert assessments, concluding that the authorities were not obligated to follow the recommendation of a specific expert opinion when other relevant factors and expert reports supported the final decision, thus affirming the lower court's ruling against the appellant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Administrativgutachten Baubewilligung Plangenehmigung Überprüfung einer früheren Entscheidung Auslegungsurteile Baukontrolle
KI-generiert
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2024 139
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 28 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Volkswirtschaftsdepartement, Bahnhofstrasse 15, \n Postfach 1180, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n