Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 196 • VG SZ III 2019 196 KI-generiert

Driver License Withdrawal Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 196
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A driver appealed a decision by the traffic authority to withdraw their driving license and mandate traffic instruction following a traffic violation. The court considered whether the lower authority had correctly determined the facts and applied the relevant traffic law, ultimately affirming the administrative decision, likely because the severity of the infraction warranted the license withdrawal and mandatory remedial instruction according to established traffic regulations concerning road safety violations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Driver License Withdrawal Appeal: The court considered whether the lower authority had correctly determined the facts and applied the relevant traffic law, ultimately affirming the administrative decision, likely because the severity of the infraction warranted the license withdrawal and mandatory remedial instruction according to established traffic regulations concerning road safety violations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Führerausweisentzug Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln Strassenverkehrssicherheit Verwaltungsbehörde Kontrollfahrt Fahren in fahrunfähigem Zustand

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs were imposed on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
III 2019 188
Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Based on Traffic Offenses
III 2021 204
Traffic Authority License Revocation Appeal
III 2018 196
Motorist Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Upheld
III 2021 91
Traffic License Withdrawal Appeal Upheld
III 2018 75
Road Traffic Authority v. Driver (License Withdrawal Appeal)

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs were imposed on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 196 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, , \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, \n B.________, , |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Führerausweisentzug / Verkehrsunterricht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: